Does not distribute, republish or otherwise provide any information or derived works to any third party in any manner or use or process information or derived works for any commercial purposes.Uses the information solely in relation to the management of their personal funds and not as a trader to the public or for the investment of corporate funds.Does not currently act in any capacity as an investment adviser, whether or not they have at some time been qualified to do so.
#Rebook 2.0 professional
Is not currently registered or qualified as a professional securities trader or investment adviser with any national or state exchange, regulatory authority, professional association or recognised professional body.Is not required to be regulated or supervised by a body concerned with the regulation or supervision of investment or financial services.Obtains access to the information in a personal capacity.Reebok Forever Floatride Energy 2.I am a private investor* I am not a private investor *A Private Investor is a recipient of the information who meets all of the conditions set out below, the recipient:.Reebok Forever Floatride Energy Smack Down - 2.0.WINNER: FFE 2.0 by majority decision because of significant increase in comfort and quality (although the OG did land a punch or two on tempo days) The 2.0 upper is a great step in the right direction for comfort and performance as a daily trainer, where the OG upper edges it out for tempo days (slightly). The 2.0 upper, being slightly more accommodating and robust, functioned better for casual paces (and still performed VERY well for tempo days). In the OG, the upper was so simple and secure that it performed really well during tempo runs as it felt so light and disappeared on the foot. There is a more "high end" feel to the new upper, feels more robust, and competes with any other upper in terms of comfort. The 2.0 introduces a more accommodating upper of engineered mesh with some additional overlays for security. The upper on the OG did the job and felt fine when running, but overall it felt cheap and stiff, especially when walking or on step-in feel. This is where you will find the largest overhaul going to the 2.0 from the OG, and for good reason.
![rebook 2.0 rebook 2.0](http://demandware.edgesuite.net/sits_pod60-pod61/dw/image/v2/AAJP_PRD/on/demandware.static/-/Sites-reebok-products/default/dw10a983ce/zoom/BS8098_01.jpg)
![rebook 2.0 rebook 2.0](http://demandware.edgesuite.net/sits_pod27/dw/image/v2/AAJP_PRD/on/demandware.static/-/Sites-reebok-products/default/dw9f47de30/zoom/V68105_01.jpg)
WINNER: FFE 2.0 by unanimous decision because of "movement" in retro logo and pull tab However, if you have a more narrow foot, you'd do fine in the OG or 2.0. Now, if you are going a half size down and have a slightly wider foot, I'd roll with the 2.0 due to the accommodating upper (more on this in a later round). If you want a performance trainer for some tempo work, I'd go the half size down.
![rebook 2.0 rebook 2.0](https://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/lily-allen-performs-live-at-glastonbury-festival-june-2014_3.jpg)
If you're looking for a slightly more stable shoe for a daily trainer that has room for your foot to expand during longer runs, I'd recommend your typical size in either the OG or 2.0. So.what do to with sizing? Thankfully I've been able to run in my typical size and a 1/2 size down, and here is what I recommend. The 2.0 carries the same specs for length and width (as far as I know from all the info we've gathered) but due to the upper the 2.0 feels much wider than the OG. The only issue with going a half size down was that the width became a bit narrow, and the forefoot platform tended to be more unstable because of the width. The OG ran slightly long but had a typical width across the board, which led many to go a 1/2 size down (myself included).
![rebook 2.0 rebook 2.0](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71fsPiq7ElL.jpg)
This was one area I expected to see some more significant changes, but they just weren't there. WINNER: FFE 2.0 by majority decision because of the increased comfort and lack of irritability